Michael Jones

Year of Call:
1998
Practice areas
  • Clinical Negligence
  • Inquest
  • Personal Injury
  • Regulatory
  • Group Litigation
"An exceptional trial advocate." "He's very approachable and clients really like him." Chambers and Partners (2020)
"A skilled negotiator who is always meticulously prepared."Legal 500 (2021)
Profile

Michael Jones specialises in insurance and personal injury litigation. The majority of his practice involves catastrophic personal injury work with a particular emphasis on traumatic brain injury and amputation cases. He acts for both Claimants and Defendants.

Michael conducts a large number of round table meetings, mediations and way forward meetings each year. His recent settlements on behalf of Claimants include a capitalised award in a TBI case exceeding £10 million (£4 million lump sum and PPO of £320,000) and a lump sum award in a TBI case caused by a stabbing incident, arising from clinical negligence, in the sum of £5.4 million.

Michael has longstanding experience in defending large group litigation cases, including the Sonae Group Litigation brought by 18,000 claimants and valued at £100 million, in which all claims and the subsequent appeal were dismissed. He is instructed in the ongoing Chirk Nuisance Group Litigation in the High Court.

Michael has a significant practice in pain cases, primarily for Defendants. He also acts for insurers in recovery actions for property damage, primarily following fire or flooding.

He has considerable experience in Prisons litigation including Jury and Article 2 Inquests. He has an extensive knowledge of Coroners' law from his time as Junior Counsel to The Shipman Inquiry.

Michael is a regular contributor to Chambers' seminar programme, most recently on the topics of brain injury litigation and amputation cases, together with the prosthetist John Sullivan.

Michael has been listed in the main legal directories since 2003.


Appointments

AG's Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown - 2012 
AG's Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown - 2007
Shipman Inquiry - Counsel to the Inquiry - 2001 - 2004 

Testimonial Quotes

Chambers & Partners 2024

Michael Jones is principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants. He also undertakes a wide range of other work, including claims relating to industrial disease and chronic pain. He regularly acts on behalf of major insurers as well as government bodies. He is particularly experienced in the handling of group litigation claims.

Strengths

"Michael is my 'go to' barrister. He is excellent. He handles all types of claims irrespective of complexity or value."

"His real strength is providing pragmatic solutions on complicated cases."

"Michael is equally adept at dealing with liability and quantum aspects of catastrophic personal injury matters. He is a very savvy negotiator as well."

Legal 500 2024 

Michael Jones – Cobden House Chambers ‘Michael is the counsel of choice on the vast majority of personal injury cases, as he is an outstanding barrister who is able to distil the key issues in even the most complex of cases. He has extensive experience in dealing with all aspects of high-value personal injury litigation, his approach to conferences with experts is extremely comprehensive and unrivalled, and he regularly goes up against Kings Counsel.'

Chambers & Partners 2023

Michael Jones is principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants. He also undertakes a wide range of other work, including claims relating to industrial disease and chronic pain. He regularly acts on behalf of major insurers as well as government bodies. He is particularly experienced in the handling of group litigation claims."Michael is really bright and always does an excellent job no matter what the issues are.""He provides clear advice in a thoughtful manner.""He is a class act."

Legal 500 2023 

Michael is a premium barrister. He is extremely personable and has a fantastic way with clients, experts and peers alike. He treats everybody with the same level of respect and attention, regardless of their position. Michael is a technically excellent barrister who is able to respond to changing or challenging circumstances in a calm and measured manner, ensuring the best outcome for his clients.

Chambers & Partners 2022

Michael Jones is principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants. He also undertakes a wide range of other work, including claims relating to industrial disease and chronic pain. Regularly acts on behalf of major insurers as well as government bodies. He is particularly experienced in the handling of group litigation claims.
Strengths: "He is outstanding and able to deal with work ranging from highly complex, multimillion-pound injury litigation down to smaller-value matters. He treats every case with the same level of skill and is always meticulously prepared. He is exceptional in conference with experts and great on his feet."

Chambers & Partners 2021

Principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants. He also undertakes a wide range of other work, including claims relating to industrial disease and chronic pain. Regularly acts on behalf of major insurers as well as government bodies. He is particularly experienced in the handling of group litigation claims.
Strengths: "He is always clear, concise and very good on his feet." "Michael is very personable and excellent with clients. He's pragmatic, achieves good outcomes and is a safe pair of hands."

Chambers & Partners - UK Bar 2020

"Principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants. He also undertakes a wide range of other work, including claims relating to industrial disease and chronic pain. Regularly acts on behalf of major insurers as well as government bodies. He is particularly experienced in the handling of group litigation claims.

Strengths: "An exceptional trial advocate." "He's very approachable and clients really like him."

Legal 500 2021 & 2020

"A skilled negotiator who is always meticulously prepared."


Legal 500 2019

"Very personable, with impressive knowledge across the personal injury spectrum."


Chambers & Partners - UK Bar 2018

"Principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants. He also undertakes a wide range of other work, including claims relating to industrial disease and chronic pain. Regularly acts on behalf of major insurers as well as government bodies. He is particularly experienced in the handling of group litigation claims.

"He is just somebody you want on your side. He has a brilliant mind, always sees the bigger picture and has a fantastic eye for detail." "He is extremely quick, organised, thorough and very articulate."

Recent work: Instructed in a group action brought by 16,626 claimants following a large fire."


Chambers & Partners - UK Bar - 2017

Principally instructed in severe brain injury cases, representing both claimants and defendants


Strengths "The law and advocacy just come naturally to him: he doesn't need to put on a show, he just gets the job done." "A top-notch junior." 

Legal 500 2017:


"A strong negotiator"



Chambers & Partners - UK Bar - 2015:


Recognised for his breadth of knowledge in catastrophic injury claims. He conducts cases on behalf of both claimants and defendants


Strengths: "He is an outstanding junior doing high-quality work.


"He leaves no stone unturned, is great with experts, is very approachable and good on his feet. He is a real fighter".


Legal 500 - 2014:


"Primarily undertakes high-value cases involving complex expert evidence. 


Mr Justice Jay described his cross examination in the Sonae Group Litigation [2015] EWHC 2264 (QB) as:


"Expert, patient" and "well constructed".


Notable Cases

Sonae Group Litigation 
First Instance [2015] EWHC 2264 (QB)
Court of Appeal [2016] EWCA Civ 1245
Claim for personal injuries brought by 16,626 Claimants following a large fire.
GLO made by Hamblen J. in July 2012  on Defendant’s application.
Claim valued by claimants at £100 million. 
Claims all dismissed.
Permission to appeal refused at oral hearing before Court of Appeal
Instructed by Defendant's insurers
Led by Michael Kent QC


JSH v PC NHSFT 
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained a severe traumatic brain injury.
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future care, accommodation and deputyship costs
Damages agreed at £5.4 million
Against Angus Moon QC
Instructed by Claimant


Knight v White 
Interim Payment Application
Claimant sustained a severe traumatic brain injury and currently living in a residential care setting. Further interim payment ordered in the sum of £250,000, to bring total interim payments to £1.63 million.
Against James Rowley QC
Instructed by Claimant

knight_v_white.pdf

Lawtel - LTL 24/4/2019 

Westlaw - [2019] 4 WLUK 367


DW Sports Group Litigation
Claim for personal injuries brought by 72 Claimants
GLO made by HHJ Wood QC in February 2014 on Defendant’s application
Claims discontinued on confidential terms
Instructed by Defendant’s insurers 


PB v SW
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained catastrophic neurological injuries. 
Liability agreed at 2/3Quantum agreed at lump sum of £2,250,000 + PPO of £124,000 - 100% lump sum equivalent £8.6 million
Led by Chris Melton QC
Instructed by Claimant


Rowell v Rowell
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained below knee amputation and claimed damages of £2.16million, including six separate prosthetics.
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future prosthetics and loss of earnings.
Damages agreed at £950,000
Instructed by Defendant 



Begum v Luty
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant Claimed £2.15 million primarily for care and single storey accommodation
Quantum agreed at £420,000
Instructed by Defendant


Marshall v Kybotech Limited
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained upper limb amputation and claimed damages of £2.056 million, including the cost of a Michelangelo hand prosthesis
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future prosthetics and lost earnings from a career in professional golf
Damages agreed at £950,000
Instructed by Defendant  

 

Phillipson v Semeniuk
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained lower limb amputation and claimed damages of £1.963 million, including a range of prosthetics.
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future prosthetics, accommodation, care and assistive technology (which was agreed at nil)
Damages agreed at £985,000
Instructed by Defendant


Wingrave v Taverner
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained lower limb amputation and claimed damages of £1.589 million, including the cost of a Genium knee prosthesis
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future prosthetics, accommodation and care
Damages agreed at £1.16 million based on the Kenevo knee prosthesis
Instructed by Defendant


Watts v Wilson and Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained severe traumatic brain injury and claimed damages of £1.2 million
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future care and case management and liability under sections 151(7)-(8) of the Road Traffic Act 1988
Damages agreed at £176,000
Instructed by Defendant


Bowden v Adler and Allen Limited
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained severe burn injuries and claimed damages of £1.6 million
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future care and case management, accommodation and future loss of earnings
Claimant accepted the Defendant’s Part 36 offer made following the JSM in the sum of £760,000
Instructed by Defendant 



Lawton v Kinder Mountain Rescue Team 
Liability trial - 4 days 
Claimant sustained serious spinal injuries following uncontrolled descent in a mountaineering exercise   
Claim dismissed
Claimant consented to dismissal after his expert witness accepted the Defendant's case on the last day of the trial
Instructed by Defendant 


Wormald v Ahmed 
Liability trial - 3 days 
Claimant sustained catastrophic spinal and brain injuries in a road traffic accident 
Claim valued by Claimant at £8 million 
Judgment 60:40% apportionment in Claimant's favour 
Instructed by Defendant 
Led by Winston Hunter QC 


Harris v Peet
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claim by elderly tetraplegic Claimant for lump sum of £1.25 million and stepped PPO of £265,000 to £345,000.
Lump sum included accommodation claim of £485,000.
Case settled on basis of lump sum of £830,000, PPO of £235,000 and insurers purchasing & adapting a bungalow, granting the Claimant a life tenancy for nominal rent.
Instructed by Defendant


Cass v Braintree Clinical Services
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant claimed damages in the sum of £850,000 arising out of alleged clinical negligence during arthroscopic surgery.
Damages agreed in the sum of £220,000.
Instructed by Defendant


Cronshaw v Harvey
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant’s claim for damages for £3.4 million arising from a traumatic cerebral haemorrhage.
Complex causation issues.Damages agreed in the sum of £1.1 million.
Instructed by Defendant


NM v Borrett
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant’s claim for damages arising out of severe traumatic brain injury. Claim for lump sum of £2.73 million plus PPO of £120,000.
Damages agreed on a lump sum basis in the sum of £3.02 million 
Instructed by Defendant


Say v Bettley
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury and claimed damages of £2.6 million
The main issues at the JSM were the viability of a PPO and reverse indemnity in the context of partial local authority funding and an agreed liability apportionment 
Damages agreed at £1.05 million lump sum
Instructed by Defendant 


Mullett v Barratt Developments and Taylor Wimpey 
Quantum Trial – 3 Days Claimant's claim for damages in the sum of £250,000 arising from orthopaedic injuries and alleged fibromyalgia.
Claim compromised at the conclusion of the Claimant’s cross examination in the sum of £22,000 with no order as to costs.
Instructed by Defendant


Cooper v Shropshire County Council
Advising Defendant (Land Drainage Authority) and its insurers in proceedings for damages and mandatory injunction arising from damage caused by river flooding
Proceedings discontinued.


McDonald v Webb
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury and claimed damages of £1.3 million
The main issue at the JSM was the likelihood of the Claimant accepting care
Damages agreed at £850,000 lump sum
Instructed by Defendant 


Platt v AMEC
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained lower limb injury with significant chance of amputation and claimed damages of £2.05 million plus provisional damages 
Damages agreed at £990,000 on a full and final basis 
Instructed by Defendant 


Smith v Carter International
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained upper limb amputation and claimed damages of £1.7 million
The main issue at the JSM was the cost and provision of future prosthetics 
Damages agreed at £1.14 million
Instructed by Defendant 


Leslie v Marshall 
Quantum trial - 4 days 
Claimant sustained complex lower limb injuries 
Damages assessed at £345,000 plus provisional damages, beating Defendant's Part 36 offer  
Instructed by Claimant  


Inquest - Keith Ruskin 
Inquest - listed for 2 days
No criticism of health care and finding of death by natural causes 
Instructed by the Treasury Solicitor   


Inquest - Elizabeth Kerr 
Inquest - listed for 3 weeks - 15 parties 
Advised in conference on complex engineering issues and represented Integral at the Inquest 
Regulation 28 letter - Report to Prevent Future Deaths - not sent to Integral
Instructed by the insurers of Integral Ltd  


R v D
Joint Settlement Meeting
Claimant sustained lower limb amputation/complex upper limb injuries and claimed damages of £3.2 million, including the cost of a BiOM prosthesis
The main issues at the JSM were the cost and provision of future prosthetics, accommodation and care
Damages agreed at £1.47 million based on the BiOM prosthesis
Instructed by Claimant
Led by Chris Melton QC 



Simmons v Houston
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury
Liability agreed at 65%
Quantum ongoing (in 2015)
Instructed by Claimant 
Led by Richard Hartley QC 


Wallace v Chief Constable Cleveland Police 
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a traumatic brain injury when hit by a police vehicle in a high-speed pursuit 
Damages agreed at £115,000 - 50% apportionment 
Instructed by Defendant 


Ingham v Wakeford 
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury in a road traffic accident 
Liability agreed at first JSM 2/3 – 1/3 apportionment in Claimant’s favour 
Damages agreed at second JSM £3 million lump sum + provisional damages subject to liability apportionment
Instructed by Claimant 
Led by Richard Hartley QC 


Mennell v Phones 4U Ltd  
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant claimed damages arising from a pain syndrome in the sum of £3.5 million 
Damages agreed at £750,000 
Instructed by Defendant  
Led by Richard Hartley QC 



Williams v Town & City Pub Company and Toshiba 
Joint Settlement Meeting Claimant claimed damages arising from a pain syndrome in the sum of £1.35 million 
Damages agreed at £300,000 Recovery action against Third Party ongoing (in 2015)
Instructed by Defendant


Thornton v Mamedgasanov  
Procedural hearing
Claimant claimed damages arising from a pain syndrome in the sum of £1.5 million 
Damages agreed at £30,000 (with an agreement not to bring proceedings for contempt) following a procedural hearing as to the admissibility of surveillance evidence 
Instructed by Defendant  


Crane v TJ Morris 
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant claimed damages arising from a pain syndrome in a sum exceeding £1 million 
Damages agreed at £50,000 plus fixed sum costs 
Instructed by Defendant  


Wallbank v British Waterways
Claimant sustained serious lower limb injury 
Damages agreed at £375,000 + provisional damages  
Instructed by Claimant  
Joint Settlement Meeting 


Casterton v Laidlaw 
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury in a road traffic accident 
Damages agreed at £1.9 million lump sum + PPO of £75,000 + provisional damages 
Instructed by Claimant 
Led by Richard Hartley QC


Murphy v the Country Inn
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained lower limb amputation and claimed damages of £1.15 million
Damages agreed at £325,000 to reflect liability issues
Instructed by Defendant 


Roberts v Hughes 
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained injuries, which ended his football career and he claimed damages of £2.5 million
The main issue at the JSM was the statistical chance of the Claimant (who was an academy player at Shrewsbury Town FC) becoming a professional footballer
Damages agreed at £260,000
Instructed by Defendant


Tinker v Samkova
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Fatal Accidents Act claim arising from a road traffic accident in the sum of £600,000
The main issue at the JSM was whether the deceased would have survived a cardiac arrest but for the RTA 
Damages agreed at £125,000
Instructed by Defendant 


Neely v Flybe and OCS
Liability trial
Claimant claimed damages under the Montreal Convention 1999 for injuries sustained whilst embarking an aircraft
Claim dismissed
Instructed by Second Defendant 



Herriott v Kinsey
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury in a road traffic accident 
Damages agreed at £1.5 million 
Instructed by Claimant  
Led by Winston Hunter QC 


Ledwith v Shell Research and MDS 
Summary judgment 
Advising Defendant on "hold harmless" clause in contract with Third Party and drafting proceedings 
Summary judgment entered for Defendant 
Instructed by Defendant 


S v B
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury and claimed damages of £2.9 million
The main issues at the JSM were the likelihood of the Claimant accepting care and the viability of a PPO
Damages agreed at £1.4 million lump sum
Instructed by Defendant 


Shah v British Midland Plc 
Liability trial
Claimant claimed damages for injuries sustained during the course of her employment as an air stewardess, which caused her to retire on medical grounds
Claim discontinued after Claimant’s evidence 
Instructed by Defendant 


Advent v Securiplex and First County  
Advising Second Defendant as to the enforceability of a limitation clause limiting liability for Claimant's losses arising from theft 
Claimant accepted the enforceability of the limitation clause


Inquest - David Sekonyela 
Inquest - listed for 3 days 
Death reportable to HSE and raising healthcare issues
Instructed by the widow of the deceased  


Griffiths v Feaver 
Liability trial - 3 days 
Claimant sustained catastrophic injuries in a road traffic accident 
Liability compromised on an 85% apportionment on day 3 of the trial 
Damages subsequently agreed at a JSM in the sum of £1.53 million plus provisional damages 
Instructed by Claimant 
Led by Richard Hartley QC  


Wilson & others v South Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Authority 
Liability trial - 4 days 
Fatal Accidents Act claim following gas explosion at a fire attended by SYFRA
Claim discontinued before trial 
Instructed by Defendant 


Hoogendoorn v Clarke 
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Fibromyalgia claim for C$2.64 million for lost earnings as a lawyer in Canada 
Damages agreed at £250,000
Instructed by Defendant 
Led by James Rowley QC 


Linkwise Sofa Dermatitis Group Litigation 
Claim for personal injuries brought by 5,000 Claimants for exposure to DMF in furniture  
GLO made by MacDuff J. in 2008 on Claimant's application
Negotiated settlement in 2010 with innovative damages matrix and claims handling agreement in respect of the 1,600 valid claims
All claims resolved by 2012.  
Instructed by Defendant's insurers 
Led by Michael Kent QC 


Mescall v Stockport NHS Foundation Trust 
JSM
Claim for damages following missed diagnosis of pyelonephritis 
Settled at £430,000
Instructed by Claimant  


Agius v Chong
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained injuries, which ended his career in Thai Boxing and claimed damages of £1.05 million
The main issues at the JSM were the Claimant's likely career and earnings in the sport of Thai Boxing
Damages agreed at £650,000
Instructed by Defendant


Howard v Shipp
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained catastrophic spinal and brain injuries in a road traffic accident 
Damages agreed at £1.6 million 
Instructed by Claimant  
Led by Chris Melton QC 


Ragg v Thorpe
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained lower limb amputation and claimed damages of £1.8 million
Damages agreed at £1.05 million
Instructed by Defendant 


Taylor v Fircroft Engineering 
Quantum trial - 4 days 
Claimant claimed damages of £500,000 for lost earnings in the oil and gas industry 
Damages assessed at £90,000 - significantly lower than the Defendant's Part 36 offer  
Instructed by Defendant   


Sutton v Welch
Joint Settlement Meeting 
Claimant sustained a catastrophic brain injury
Damages agreed at £1.03 million + provisional damages 
Instructed by Claimant 
Led by Richard Hartley QC 


H v CICA
Appeal to CICA
Traumatic brain injury caused by shooting with air gun pellet 
Appeal against award of £80,000
Awarded £460,000 on appeal 





Membership

Professional Negligence Bar Association
Personal Injuries Bar Association 

Qualifications

Bar Vocational Course (ICSL) 1998
LL.B (Hons) (Birmingham - 1997) 




This site uses cookies that enable us to make improvements, provide relevant content, and for analytics purposes. For more details, see our Cookie Policy. By clicking Accept, you consent to our use of cookies.