Eduard is highly experienced across the full spectrum of personal injury litigation and costs. He is a skilled and persuasive advocate regularly instructed in the Fast Track, Intermediate Track, and the Multi Track in matters ranging from complex interlocutory applications to CCMCs and trials. He has appeared in numerous unreported appeal hearings in the County Court with an outstanding success rate.
Eduard accepts instructions for both Claimants and Defendants. He is well-versed in fundamental dishonesty allegations, acting both in pursuit of and in defence of such claims.
Eduard has a growing interest in cases involving actions against the police and clinical negligence claims. He welcomes instructions for advisory, drafting, and advocacy work in this areas.
Along with his court practice, Eduard is routinely instructed to draft statements of case, schedules of loss and counter schedules, and to advice on prospects, quantum and/or a specific issue or point of law.
Eduard has often been described by his Instructing Solicitors as a fierce cross-examiner and a wonderful advocate to work with.
Eduard works very closely with his instructing Solicitors to provide an exceptional customer service both to his lay and professional clients. He has consistently received feedback from his clients for his ability to put them at ease and to guide them through the entire court process.
Employer’s Liability Claims
Public Liability Claims
Occupier’s Liability Claims
Defective Premises Act Claims
Highways Act Claims
Road Traffic Accidents
Credit Hire Claims
Animals Act Cases
Fraud and Fundamental Dishonesty (both pursuing and defending)
Costs (including CCMSs, Costs Only Proceedings, Detailed Assessment Hearings, and Oral Review Hearings following Provisional Assessment)
Eduard has a keen interest in sports and cooking. He is a former amateur youth boxing champion of the northern region and an extreme sports participant focusing on bungee jumping, rock climbing, mountain biking, sky diving etc. He is a thrill seeker who always brings his courage with him into a courtroom. Unfortunately, he doesn’t fare as well in cooking.
E v L [2025] – Appeal hearing following a strike out of the Claimant’s case. Eduard represented the Claimant/Appellant. The appeal was made on 3 grounds. Eduard succeeded on the first ground and the matter was reinstated to proceed to trial. The second and third grounds were not pursued as all grounds aimed to overturn the decision of the lower Court to strike out. The ground upon which the appeal was allowed dealt with the erroneous interpterion of section 69 of the Solicitors Act 1974 by the Court below.
Cooley v Polycorr Limited [2025] – Employer’s liability claim arising from a complex injury in the workplace. Eduard represented the Claimant. The Circuit Judge preferred the Claimant’s evidence, referred to the excellent closing submissions put forward by Eduard, and accepted the questions put to the Defendant’s witness in cross examination which, as the Learned Judge said, the witness was not able to answer positively considering his managerial position in the Defendant’s company. Judgment was handed down for the Claimant.
Fannon v Asda Stores Limited [2026] – Road Traffic Incident in which breach of duty was admitted. Eduard represented the Defendant. Quantum was in dispute. The Claimant sought an award in excess of £13,000. Through an outstanding cross examination of the Claimant, followed by thorough submissions, Eduard managed to decrease the Claimant’s damages by 67.1%.
Member of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple
Member of the Northern Circuit
Member of the Young Bar Mentoring Scheme (acting mentor for prospective barristers)
Member of the Personal Injury Bar Association
This site uses cookies that enable us to make improvements, provide relevant content, and for analytics purposes. For more details, see our Cookie Policy. By clicking Accept, you consent to our use of cookies.
